AFM seeks to achieve the Fund’s investment objective by choosing attractively priced investments overseen by quality managers. We use a number of processes to identify potential investments, including screening for historical performance, volatility and other criteria. We use many information sources to assist in this process.
If an investment is assessed as not being able to deliver the return targets of the Fund, it is not considered for inclusion, regardless of other qualities.
An investment assessed as having potential for inclusion in the portfolio must pass through a number of hurdles. These include an analysis of historical performance, due diligence, a review of key service providers and a qualitative assessment of the manager and their investment style.
In assessing suitable investments, AFM will place particular emphasis on the factors displayed below.
If the outcome of these processes is positive, the investment is considered acceptable for inclusion within the investment portfolio. Managers and investments chosen for the portfolio need not meet all the below criteria, and some criteria carry lighter weightings than others. When making an assessment, AFM gives greater weight to qualitative factors than quantitative factors.
This invariably means there is a degree of subjective judgment involved.
