US Treasuries are dominating the headlines for all the wrong reasons. After the US Treasury announced that it will more than double the size of its long-bond buybacks, yields rose rather than fell. In other words, the world’s largest borrower told the market what it wanted, and the market said no.
Many Australian investors continue to focus on income-generating investments. However, with ongoing market volatility, it’s worth thinking carefully about how income-generating investments are allocated within a portfolio.
Fixed income is often described as the defensive part of an investment portfolio. For many investors, it is expected to provide regular income, reduce reliance on share market returns and help smooth the overall investment journey. That description is broadly right. But it can also create an unrealistic expectation that fixed income investing is simple, safe and always stable.
US Treasuries are dominating the headlines for all the wrong reasons. After the US Treasury announced that it will more than double the size of its long-bond buybacks, yields rose rather than fell. In other words, the world’s largest borrower told the market what it wanted, and the market said no.
Many Australian investors continue to focus on income-generating investments. However, with ongoing market volatility, it’s worth thinking carefully about how income-generating investments are allocated within a portfolio.
Fixed income is often described as the defensive part of an investment portfolio. For many investors, it is expected to provide regular income, reduce reliance on share market returns and help smooth the overall investment journey. That description is broadly right. But it can also create an unrealistic expectation that fixed income investing is simple, safe and always stable.
Analysing inflation-linked ETFs & funds, credit spreads and global income rotations.
Between inflation and market activity, investors in fixed income have had their work cut out for them. Post the GFC, rates remained low and investors in many instances were forced to look towards higher risk assets, like equities or more recently, private markets, for yield.
Savvy investors are always on the lookout for the proverbial canary in the coalmine, particularly when markets keep hitting all-time highs with seemingly unstoppable momentum.
It’s well known that most Australian portfolios are overweight equities to the detriment of their debt exposure. It’s easy to understand why. Local and global equities have performed strongly over the long term, and particularly since the pandemic selloff. It’s also easier for most investors to understand equities than debt.
The Australian mortgage fund sector has grown to become an important bridge between investor capital and property lending. While the sector remains comparatively young, its recent trajectory invites a compelling question: what if the sector were to follow the path carved out by the more mature US market? The answer may provide valuable insight into the opportunities and risks that lie ahead…
Global bond markets are far from boring in 2025. The death of the ‘TINA’ era (‘There is No Alternative’ to Equities) is resulting in surging bond demand from institutional and superannuation investors, while the supply of primary local issuance is under strain.
Private credit has traditionally been classified within the 'alternatives' bucket of a portfolio and grouped with illiquid assets such as private equity, real estate, and infrastructure. For many investors, this category has made up no more than 10–20% of total portfolio allocations.
Mankind has a short memory — and in finance, that forgetfulness comes at a price.
After three decades in private lending, I’ve seen the same cycle repeat itself three times. Each time, I’ve raised the warning flag. Each time, the industry has dismissed it as professional jealousy. Each time, I’ve been proved right.
Most investors think of fixed income investing as being a lower risk asset class. Yet surprisingly, three major fixed income managed funds have recently collapsed.
It’s been a stark reminder that even at ‘safe’ end of the investment risk spectrum, vigilance, transparency, and governance should be regarded as non-negotiable.
Fixed income investing has long been seen as the sober counterpart to the wilder ride typical of equity investing. Investors generally invest in fixed income with the expectation of reliable income returns and capital preservation.
Mortgage funds have surged in popularity in recent years due to the attractive yields on offer which are backed by tangible property assets. However, as the sector matures and becomes more crowded, it’s more important than ever that investors understand not all funds are created equal. The vast spectrum of mortgage fund disclosure is also important to understand, since much of it is below the minimum level required by prudent investors.
In the world of bond investing, few concepts are as powerful, or as misunderstood, as duration.
Often simplified as a measure of interest rate sensitivity, duration can be used as a powerful tool to help investors make more informed and profitable decisions when investing in bond funds.
Moreover, understanding duration at a deeper level can significantly enhance investors’ returns and reduce their risk by optimising timing, improving fund selection, and navigating changing interest rate environments more effectively…
As markets wobble in the wake of President Trump’s tariffs, bonds are stepping up to the plate, providing a safe haven for investors while stocks plummet. Most bond ETFs and managed funds have started outperforming, with many reaching performance heights not seen in months.